Polished aluminium with a reflective, low-Ra mirror surface

Tolerances guide

Surface roughness (Ra), explained for machined parts

"Ra" appears on most drawings, yet it is often misunderstood. This article explains what it means, what is realistic in CNC machining, how it differs from Rz, and how to call it out so that smoothness is paid for only where it is required.

What Ra is. Ra is the average roughness of a surface, measured in micrometres (µm) as the mean deviation of the surface profile from its centre line. Lower means smoother. It describes texture and is entirely separate from dimensional tolerance: a part can be exactly on size yet feel rough, or feel smooth yet be out of tolerance.

The Ra ladder, what's realistic, and what it's for

Achievable Ra by process, confirmed per face at DFM review. Cost is relative.
Ra (µm)Ra (µin)Typical processLooks / good forCost
6.3250Roughing, bead blastCoarse matte; non-critical faces$
3.2125Standard millingVisible tool lines; general surfaces$
1.663Finish milling / turningDefault machined finish; most faces$
0.832Fine turning / finishing passSliding fits, static seals, gaskets$$
0.416Grinding / light polishFine & dynamic seals$$$
0.28Grinding / polish / EDM skimBearing journals, near-optical$$$
≤0.1≤4Lapping / mirror polishMirror, optical, sealing-critical$$$$
Rougher Smoother as-machined 6.3 3.2 1.6 0.8 0.4 0.2 ≤0.1 Ra (µm), each step down multiplies the finishing time

Why smoother costs more

Down to about Ra 1.6, the finish carries no added cost — it is simply how the part comes off the machine. Ra 0.8 typically requires one additional finishing pass, a modest cost. Below Ra 0.8, the cost reflects grinding, polishing or hand-work, and each step down multiplies the time. A mirror finish at Ra 0.1 can cost more than the machining itself.

Ra vs Rz: a key distinction

Ra is an average over the whole profile. Rz is the average peak-to-valley height, so for the same surface it reads roughly 4–7× higher. That means "Rz 6.3" describes a far smoother surface than "Ra 6.3." If your drawing uses Rz, please label it clearly so it is not read as Ra.

A practical point from our shop floor: turned surfaces come off finer than milled ones because the tool stays in continuous contact, so a turned Ra 1.6 is straightforward while a milled Ra 0.8 demands considerable effort. Where a feature can be turned, a finer finish is often achievable at lower cost. A fine Ra is also a per-face request: smoothing one sealing face is inexpensive, smoothing the entire part is not.
Coatings do not fix Ra: plating and anodizing mirror the surface beneath them. A part at Ra 1.6 remains Ra 1.6 after nickel — tool marks included. For a face that must be both smooth and coated, we polish or brush it before coating.

How to call it out on your drawing

SURFACE: Ra 0.8 µm MAX ON FACE A  (symbol per ISO 21920-1, formerly ISO 1302)
ALL OTHER SURFACES: Ra 3.2 µm  (general note)

Call out the fine Ra only on the faces that require it and leave the rest as-machined. This keeps the part cost-effective and indicates precisely where the finishing effort should be directed.

Three common mistakes

  • A blanket fine Ra across the whole part — this incurs finishing cost that is not needed.
  • Confusing Ra and Rz — Rz reads 4–7× higher for the same surface.
  • Expecting plating or anodizing to smooth a rough surface — it only mirrors what's underneath.
Send your drawing, quote in 48 hours See the Finish Library
High-speed CNC machining centres along the production aisle at Fenva Precision

Spend smoothness wisely

We'll confirm achievable Ra per face.

Mark the faces that matter and send the drawing, we'll confirm the Ra we can hold and quote in 48 hours.